The 11th annual Capitol Hill Exhibition for NSF-funded research, sponsored by the Coalition for National Science Funding (CNSF), was held on the evening of June 21nd. The Federation is a member of CNSF and invited Dr. Sheena Iyengar, a psychologist from Columbia University's Business School, to represent the Federation and NSF's Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Directorate. Dr. Iyengar's exhibit, "The Psychological Costs of Ever Increasing Choice: When Too Many Options Lead to Suboptimal Retirement Savings Decisions," featured her research on the types of decisions we make when presented with varying numbers of options (see our "Advocacy Update" below for more details on Dr. Iyengar's research).
Also representing the behavioral sciences were Federation member societies APA and AERA. The American Psychological Association featured Sujeeta Bhatt, PhD (Georgetown University Medical Center) with an exhibit on "Catching Spies: Psychological Science and fMRI," and the American Educational Research Association's exhibit, "Kids as Working Scientists," highlighted the work of Dr. Nancy Songer (University of Michigan). Only four of the 34 exhibits were from the behavioral sciences, making the participation of groups such as the Federation, APA, and AERA a crucial component to the exhibit's success.
Exhibition attendees, some of whom are pictured on this page, included: Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD), Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY), Lois Capps (D-CA), Howard Coble (R-NC), Benjamin Cardin (D-MD), Jim Kolbe (R-AZ), Vernon Ehlers (R-MI), Bob Etheridge (D-NC), Bob Inglis (R-SC), Dale E. Kildee (D-MI), Dan Lipinski (D-IL), Edward Markey (D-MA), Michael R. McNultey (D-NY), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Deborah Price (R-OH). Also, David Lightfoot, PhD, Assistant Director for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences at NSF, and Jim Turner, Minority Chief Council, House Science Committee.
Advocacy Update
Several hours before the CNSF exhibition opened, Federation Policy Analyst Jill Egeth and Dr. Iyengar met with staff members of the Senate Finance committee to discuss potential applications of Dr. Iyengar's research to Social Security reform. Her research focuses on the type and quality of choices that we make when presented with varying numbers of options. She has examined choice in a multitude of contexts ranging from employee motivation and performance in a global organization, to chocolate displays at Godiva, to the magazine aisles of grocery stores and, still further, to mutual fund options in retirement benefits plans. Her findings suggest that while we are more attracted to large numbers of potential options, we tend to completely opt out of or postpone decision-making when our choices are too plentiful. Additionally, those of us who do manage to make decisions when presented with an over-abundance of options report lower levels of satisfaction with their choices than those who make selections from a less bountiful selection.
These findings have important implications for the current and future implementation of retirement savings plans. Many company- or university-sponsored benefit plans offer hundreds of different savings portfolio options. Dr Iyengar's research on benefit plans indicates that these large numbers of savings options lead people to either make sub-optimal investment decisions or to completely opt out of the savings plan. We met with staff members of the Senate Finance Committee (the committee with jurisdiction over Social Security) to share Dr. Iyengar's findings and discuss their relevance to the administration's plans to privatize Social Security, which could lead to even more potentially overwhelming options for American's trying to save for their retirement.
To learn more about Sheena Iyengar's research, visit her homepage: http://www.columbia.edu/~ss957/
For information on the Coalition for National Science Funding, please click here: www.cnsfweb.org